![]() |
|
|
Oops, Try Again!
Jan 1, 2004 12:00 PM
, By Grant A. Johnson
Direct marketers understand how “controlled mistakes” can significantly and positively affect their bottom lines. In fact, to be more successful, maybe we should think about the awful, horrific mistakes we could make with our next direct mail effort. If we plan for the unexpected and test a radical idea or two, it could lead to more creative, meaningful and response-laden results. In direct mail, the most successful practitioners test, test and test some more. These professionals know full well that they will write, design and mail numerous failures in their search for a control package… and then send out many more “mistakes” to beat it. In fact, the most successful DMers know that failing to test is the only unforgivable mistake. It's a fact that many times unintentional mistakes — let's call them fortuitous mistakes — lead to great success. Several years ago I was working with a fraternal insurance company engaged in a split-cell test to help its field agents sell more insurance to current policyholders. By their nature, insurance companies are extremely conservative. Compliance officers also make the selling process difficult at best. After reviewing the makeup of current policyholders, we decided to segment the audience by age and family demographics and create unique packages for each of two predominant cells that emerged. We would then test them against an established control package. The corporate color of the firm was burgundy. However, due to a series of mishaps (not entirely ours), the company's brochure included in one of the packages was printed in hot pink. The client ranted. But then the results were tallied — and the client raved. The wild, totally unplanned color actually improved response rates by a significant margin. We all know that packages almost always pull a better response than self-mailers. It's just a direct marketing fact. Yet, when a health insurance client wanted to cut production costs on a package we created, I thought outside traditional direct response boundaries and decided to test a self-mailer. No “normal” DR pro would likely make such a suggestion, but because so many factors were stacked against doing the self-mailer (complicated product; has to be sold, not bought; more information rather than less to make the sale) we decided to test the self-mailer. At worst we could determine how much less effective it was than the package, and at best if it would win. The self-mailer won the test, so we tested it a second time and it won again. We rolled out the triumphant self-mailer as the new control. This “mistake-gone-right” gets even better. The printer switched the paper stock that was used in the tests — to a cheaper, matte-finish paper vs. the glossy stock we specified — and to our surprise, the response increased considerably. Not only did the self-mailer exceed its weekly lead-generating goal, but its cost per mailing was four times less compared with the original glossy five-piece package. In another instance — before ink-jet technology, when laser printing was the only option for fast personalization — production issues played a part in what could have been a direct mail disaster. For a financial institution we laser-printed names and return addresses on the mailing's outer envelope and accompanying letter. Due to severe humidity, moisture caused the ink to partially flake off many of the letters and return addresses. This problem turned out to be a stroke of luck. Responses to the mailer soared because recipients were convinced the packages were personally written to them, one by one. Mistakes, mishaps and accidents occur in the marketing world every day. Here are 10 direct mail mistakes marketers routinely make:
Testing, when done correctly, will help a company decrease the number of pieces mailed and simultaneously increase its return on investment. It allows marketers to determine, in a real world setting, what works and why. One final, fortuitous blunder: Results of a recent integrated campaign, including e-mail, helped Summerfest, the world's largest music festival held annually in Milwaukee, generate business-to-business ticket sales. We hired a specialty e-mail service to compile a list of business e-mail addresses for a five-county area surrounding Milwaukee — about 2,500 addresses. The vendor accidentally deployed our e-mail to its entire Wisconsin business list — some 6,600 addresses. This mistake worked double duty in our favor. First, we reached about three times the businesses without spending an additional penny. Second, we found that many businesses outside of Milwaukee were surprisingly receptive to our Summerfest ticket offer. This information will help Summerfest expand and further segment its target audience next year. Grant A. Johnson is CEO of Johnson Direct, Brookfield, WI. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
| August 1, 2008 | July 1, 2007 | June 1, 2008 | May 1, 2008 | April 1, 2008 | March 1, 2008 | February 1, 2008 | ||
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
| Subscribe | View Sample | Subscribe | View Sample | Subscribe | ||
| © 2008 Penton Media, Inc. | Home | Penton Media Inc. | Contact Us | For Advertisers | For Search Partners | Privacy Policy |