Direct
advanced search
Advertising | Contact Us | Multichannel Merchant Magazine | DM Buyer's Guide | E-Newsletters | Subscribe
More for Less
Dec 1, 2006 12:00 PM , By RICHARD H. LEVEY
buyer's guide
Find any supplier you need - agencies, CRM, fulfillment, lists, e-commerce, paper, printers, telemarketing, and more.
Featured Categories
Lists and Data
Telemarketing
Database Marketing
E-commerce
Web Marketing
Agency & Creative Services
Print, Production & Paper
Lists and Data Processing
:: view all categories
Resource Center
Get free access to more than 50,000 list data cards - one of the most comprehensive databases in the industry.
>> Search Now
This Month in Direct Magazine
Deal With It
Direct had a full house for this year's list roundtable. Considering all the additional responsibilities on brokers' plates, that's impressive...

See Full July Issue


DIRECT MARKETING is cyclical. In boom times DMers attempt to change their fortunes through prospecting; in slower periods they focus on nurturing existing relationships.

As Direct's annual readership survey shows, in 2006 DMers continued to expand their client base. Understandably, fewer anticipate more sales or higher margins; new customers are harder sells and tend to be less profitable.

They also foresee a slight slowdown in spending, which at first glance might not seem to go hand in hand with the boost in prospecting. After all, shouldn't that mean spending will be up?

Not necessarily. “The decreased effectiveness of television [as an advertising medium] due to ad-skipping systems like TiVo means there's an increased supply of dollars,” says Eric Schmitt, executive vice president and senior principal for professional services at The Allant Group, Naperville, IL. “But because of the many places to put it, there's a lot more confusion among marketers.”

Where's the money going? Respondents are cutting back on direct mail, both to customers and prospects. And fewer are using catalogs, opting instead for lower cost electronic channels like e-mail, Web advertising and search. But much was spent on activities that support these channels, such as Web site development and search engine optimization.

“[Unlike 1998-99], this time around spending isn't speculative,” Schmitt says. “It's rooted in sound business plans. Anything being spent has clear financial benefits.

“Dollars also are flowing to customer analysis and optimization,” he adds. “But there's a difference between building a response model and setting up an infrastructure that allows you to understand your customers. The money is [being used to build] customer insight.”

Dig a little deeper into the numbers and one finds that more business-to-business marketers expect spending cuts in 2007 than their consumer counterparts. That's because B-to-Bers can trim budgets while stepping up prospecting — unsolicited B-to-B e-mail doesn't cause the same rancor as unsolicited consumer messages. And consumer and mixed-focus firms (those that serve both consumers and businesses) plan to spend more in 2007 than B-to-B marketers.

Channel-use figures bear this out. B-to-Bers are outstripping consumer DMers in funds slated for e-efforts next year. They're also moving money into outbound telemarketing — an avenue substantially weakened for consumer marketers thanks to the federal do-not-call list. More than half of the B-to-B respondents say they use telemarketing, compared with less a third of those from the consumer sector.

“Electronic media are catching up [on the industry's move to finer targeting],” says John Harrison, partner and executive director at Keystone Equities, Oaks, PA. “Non-traditional DM users, and the user population as a whole, are recognizing its value.”

If there's good news in the traditional mail segment, it's for vendors such as printers and letter-shops. Some DMers are mailing more to their house files, especially those that target both businesses and consumers. But for prospecting, the number of B-to-B and consumer firms saying they'll boost mail volume has dropped. Barely a third claim volume was up, compared with nearly 50% of B-to-B and almost 60% of consumer mailers last year.

Printing companies' financials back this finding. Shortly before it was acquired by R.R. Donnelley, Banta Corp. noted that its catalog unit's third quarter revenue dropped 20%, primarily due to cuts in catalog size and print-run quantities. Banta also said its direct marketing division's revenue was comparable with last year's but overall volume was up, meaning marketers were turning to lower cost printing options.

In early November, Quebecor World Inc. announced it was closing two U.S. catalog printing plants and shifting that work to other facilities. Quebecor is now sharpening its focus on ancillary services, such as mail list optimization and co-mailing. As with Banta, Quebecor said catalog volume was up but related revenue flat, perhaps signaling a move to less expensive offerings. Quebecor did report direct mail revenue rose nearly 5% for the first nine months of 2006, but didn't indicate what portion was attributable to new services.

Not all is dire for direct mail.

“Money is [being allocated for] print and production when it's driven by database marketing,” says Harrison. “Especially print on demand. Mail is the single most targetable medium. And it always will have a place. Bank credit card issuers find they're still able to do it profitably. But it will be better targeted and more personalized.”

Interestingly, while marketers in general probably will spend less on direct, in 2006 both B-to-B and consumer practitioners raised the DM share of their advertising budgets.

Part of the austerity move includes gathering creative design functions under one roof. In 2006 more DMers relied on in-house agencies or staffs to handle these chores, shying away from freelancers and agencies.

Methodology

This survey was conducted for Direct by Prism Business Media Marketing Research, an in-house firm. It was e-mailed to 8,597 Direct subscribers. Participants were chosen on an nth-name basis (a representative sample of all subs).

An initial copy of the survey, offering a chance to win one of four $50 Amazon.com gift certificates, was sent out Sept. 29. Two follow-up e-mails, along with the sweepstakes offer, were sent to non-respondents.

Results are based on surveys returned by 161 qualified participants: corporate or general managers (37%); sales, marketing or telemarketing executives (37%); advertising or promotion managers (10%); and circulation, list or media managers (8%). The remaining 8% were fulfillment, operations or production managers, CIOs and consultants.

The median annual revenue of respondents' companies was $152.9 million. Current-year revenue was reported as follows: under $1 million (28%); $1 million to $2.5 million (8%); $2.5 million to $5 million (7%); $5 million to $10 million (13%); $10 million to $25 million (10%); $25 million to $100 million (14%); $100 million to $500 million (7%); $500 million to $1 billion (1%); and more than $1 billion (11%). Numbers may not total 100% due to rounding.

Anticipated Changes in 2007 Spending*
Increase Decrease No Change
Advertising on other Web sites 49% 5% 46%
Blow-ins or bind-ins 23 8 69
Card packs 18 24 59
Catalogs 36 8 57
Co-op mailings 34 10 55
Direct mail to customers 44 4 52
Direct mail to prospects 51 3 46
Direct response promotions 45 5 50
DR radio advertising 48 5 48
DR space advertising 36 12 52
DRTV advertising 62 38
E-mail to customers 61 2 37
E-mail to prospects 61 2 37
Fax marketing (outbound) 27 7 67
Freestanding inserts 35 5 60
Package inserts 27 3 70
Point of purchase 30 3 67
Search engine marketing 69 1 30
Search engine optimization 37 15 48
Space advertising 34 8 58
Statement stuffers 33 6 61
Telemarketing (inbound, including 800 #s) 20 4 76
Telemarketing (outbound) 25 75
Web site development/ maintenance 61 4 34
*Based on respondents using each method. Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.



Back to Top

Browse Issues
Direct Cover Direct Cover Direct Cover Direct Cover Direct Cover Direct Cover Direct Cover
0
July 1, 2007 June 1, 2008 May 1, 2008 April 1, 2008 March 1, 2008 February 1, 2008 January 1, 2008
Browse Back Issues
Browse E-Newsletters
0 0 0 0
0
0 0
0