Sponsored Content WEBINAR: ELECTION 2008: E-mail Tips from a Political Insider   WEBINAR: Becoming the Illusionist: The Magic of Using "Brand" to Drive Response without Results Disappearing in the Process   WEBINAR: Score and Win Through Cooperation   TOOLS OF THE TRADE: Holiday's are prime-time for email marketing - maximize your ROI by getting to the inbox   ON DEMAND WEBINAR--MASTER CLASS: High Performance Online and Off-line Strategies for Large Scale Customer Acquisition   FREE WHITE PAPER - Direct Mail and the Internet Find any supplier you need - agencies, CRM, fulfillment, lists, e-commerce, paper, printers, telemarketing, and more. Featured Categories Lists and Data Telemarketing Database Marketing E-commerce Web Marketing Agency & Creative Services Print, Production & Paper Lists and Data Processing :: view all categories Get free access to more than 50,000 list data cards - one of the most comprehensive databases in the industry. >> Search Now DIRECT Buzz Blog Webinars Buyer's Guide Calculators JobZone ListFinder Promo Calendar Research Store E-Newsletters Print Magazine This Month in Direct Magazine Deal With It Direct had a full house for this year's list roundtable. Considering all the additional responsibilities on brokers' plates, that's impressive... See Full July Issue

WEBSTER MIGHT NOT AGREE with the Federal Trade Commission's definition of the word “sender.” But direct marketers now have every reason to be happy about it.

The FTC has determined that multiple advertisers in an e-mail newsletter can't all be held responsible for the letter's compliance with the Can Spam Act. Instead, the commission would allow the advertisers to designate one sender.

Published in the May 12 issue of the Federal Register, the proposed rule change clears up a niggling holdover from the passage of Can Spam, and was welcomed by e-mail vendors and trade groups.

“This is good for marketers,” said Elaine O'Gorman, vice president for marketing at e-mail marketing services firm Silverpop. “It gives you the standard under which you can name only one person to be responsible for opt-out data.”

Jerry Cerasale, senior vice president of government affairs for the Direct Marketing Association, agreed. “Multiple advertisers can pick the sender,” he said. “Only one has to be the sender and be responsible for scrubbing the list.”

The main beneficiaries are the publishers of advertiser-supported newsletters and their advertisers. Commenters had argued that requiring the use of multiple suppression lists would increase costs and “endanger the existence of such newsletters,” the FTC noted in the Federal Register.

Apparently agreeing with this, the FTC stated that “one of several persons whose products or services are advertised or promoted in an e-mail message” can be the sender. However, that entity would be required to meet one of three criteria: It would have to control the content, choose the mailing list, or be identified in the “from” line.

Despite their relief, observers noted there are a couple of clinkers in the proposed rule change. One is that the opt-out response time would be changed from 10 days to three, according to O'Gorman.

“We think they're going to get universal push-back on that,” she said. “It's an invitation for us to back up trucks to the FTC loading docks with reams of data.”

Another is a proviso that no advertiser which is not the designated sender can have control of the e-mail's content. This could include the “narrative in between where you place the ads,” Cerasale said. The DMA plans to comment.

The FTC had set June 27 as the deadline for final comment on the proposal.