Sponsored Content WEBINAR: ELECTION 2008: E-mail Tips from a Political Insider   WEBINAR: Becoming the Illusionist: The Magic of Using "Brand" to Drive Response without Results Disappearing in the Process   WEBINAR: Score and Win Through Cooperation   TOOLS OF THE TRADE: Holiday's are prime-time for email marketing - maximize your ROI by getting to the inbox   ON DEMAND WEBINAR--MASTER CLASS: High Performance Online and Off-line Strategies for Large Scale Customer Acquisition   FREE WHITE PAPER - Direct Mail and the Internet Find any supplier you need - agencies, CRM, fulfillment, lists, e-commerce, paper, printers, telemarketing, and more. Featured Categories Lists and Data Telemarketing Database Marketing E-commerce Web Marketing Agency & Creative Services Print, Production & Paper Lists and Data Processing :: view all categories Get free access to more than 50,000 list data cards - one of the most comprehensive databases in the industry. >> Search Now DIRECT Buzz Blog Webinars Buyer's Guide Calculators JobZone ListFinder Promo Calendar Research Store E-Newsletters Print Magazine This Month in Direct Magazine Deal With It Direct had a full house for this year's list roundtable. Considering all the additional responsibilities on brokers' plates, that's impressive... See Full July Issue

In a massive blow to efforts to have Utah’s do-not-e-mail law overturned, the U.S. Department of Justice has weighed in with court papers supporting the state’s much-hated registry.

However, the effort left the biggest argument against the registry unaddressed.

In a brief filed last week, the Justice Department said that contrary to porn group the Free Speech Coalition’s claims, the federal Can-Spam Act does not supersede Utah’s so-called child protection registry act, and the state’s do-not e-mail registry does not infringe on free speech.

Though mainstream marketers aren’t taking part in the Free Speech Coalition’s lawsuit against Utah, advertising trade groups have lined up against Utah’s do-not e-mail registry, hoping the porn group wins its fight.

The Justice Department weighing in for the registry cannot be seen by these groups as good news.

“It’s never good news when the 800-pound gorilla weighs in on the other side,” said Jerry Mooney, the lawyer representing the Free Speech Coalition

Not surprisingly, Unspam Technologies, the company that has been lobbying nationally for states to pass registry laws and runs the do-not-e-mail registries in Utah and Michigan, issued a press release touting the news.

“The Department of Justice has clarified the Can-Spam Act and effectively closed the potential legal loophole pornographers were trying to use in order justify sending adult-oriented material to Utah’s children,” said Matthew Prince, CEO of Unspam, in the release. “The United States has affirmed that even in the age of the Internet, states have the right to help parents keep unwanted material out of their homes.”

The one bright spot is that the Justice Department declined to address the Free Speech Coalition’s argument that Utah’s do-not-e-mail registry poses an unconstitutional interference with interstate commerce.

“They said they didn’t have a dog in that hunt, which surprises me,” said Mooney. “They addressed the First Amendment issue, which they really didn’t have an interest in, maybe other than a political one, and they didn’t address the commerce issue, which I would think would be of governmental interest.”

Mooney said the interstate commerce argument is his strongest weapon he has against Utah’s registry.

As for the Free Speech Coalition’s argument that Utah’s law is superseded by the Can-Spam Act, the Justice Department said: “[T]he Can-Spam Act’s preemption provision—which applies only to laws governing ‘the use of electronic mail to send commercial messages’—does not preempt the [Utah registry law’s] application to communications ‘containing material harmful to minors.’”

The Justice Department also argued against the Free Speech Coalition’s claims that the registry infringes on freedom of speech.

“This claim, if successful, would unjustifiably favor the dubious ‘right’ to send unsolicited sexually oriented material directly and indiscriminately to personal e-mail addresses, heedless of whether they belong to adults or children, and regardless of the expressed wishes of the owner of the addresses,’” the Justice Department’s argument said.

Marketers, the Federal Trade Commission and others have argue that so-called child protection registries make it easier for online predators to get children’s e-mail addresses. The Justice Department acknowledged these arguments, but said it is up to Utah to determine the risks for itself.

“[T]his is a policy determination, necessarily based on predictive judgment, that is within the prerogative of the Utah legislature to make,” the Justice Department said.

“The protection of the fundamental rights of parents to protect children from harmful sexually oriented material is indisputable a worthy goal,” the department argued. “At this preliminary stage, plaintiff has not provided the court with any basis for its request to halt Utah’s experiment in its tracks.”

The case is pending before Judge Dale Kimball in U.S. District Court in Utah. The first hearing is scheduled for tomorrow afternoon.