Direct
advanced search
Advertising | Contact Us | Multichannel Merchant Magazine | DM Buyer's Guide | E-Newsletters | Subscribe
USPS Denies Rate Case Withdrawal: Reports
Jun 20, 2005 3:31 PM , By Larry Riggs
buyer's guide
Find any supplier you need - agencies, CRM, fulfillment, lists, e-commerce, paper, printers, telemarketing, and more.
Featured Categories
Lists and Data
Telemarketing
Database Marketing
E-commerce
Web Marketing
Agency & Creative Services
Print, Production & Paper
Lists and Data Processing
:: view all categories
Resource Center
Get free access to more than 50,000 list data cards - one of the most comprehensive databases in the industry.
>> Search Now
This Month in Direct Magazine
Deal With It
Direct had a full house for this year's list roundtable. Considering all the additional responsibilities on brokers' plates, that's impressive...

See Full July Issue


The U.S. Postal Service is denying reports that it might be considering a withdrawal of the current rate case.

"I don't know what happened behind closed doors but as far as I know the rate case is going forward," said USPS spokesman Jerry McKiernan.

Sources said that because of the substantial improvement in USPS finances, postal management had asked the Board of Governors for permission to pull the 2005 postal rate case, but several members of the BOG balked at it, apparently concerned over how it may affect possible postal reform legislation now pending in the House and Senate.

McKiernan conceded that when the USPS filed the rate case, it had originally estimated its fiscal year 2005 net income to be $1.64 billion. "But now we're projecting net income to be $1.68 billion," he said. Fiscal Year 2005 ends Sept. 30.

"I don't have any first-hand knowledge of any plans to withdraw the case but I do know the USPS is doing better financially than they had expected and we're using that for discussions about a settlement of the rate case," said Jerry Cerasale, senior vice president of the Direct Marketing Association.

He said the DMA was looking to possibly use this information as a bargaining chip to seek a delays in implementation of he rate case – to July of 2006 from January -- the current date when the new rates are expected to take effect.



Back to Top

Browse Issues
Direct Cover Direct Cover Direct Cover Direct Cover Direct Cover Direct Cover Direct Cover
0
July 1, 2007 June 1, 2008 May 1, 2008 April 1, 2008 March 1, 2008 February 1, 2008 January 1, 2008
Browse Back Issues
Browse E-Newsletters
0 0 0 0
0
0 0
0